However, one theme seems to always percolate to the surface: the perception that practicing medicine in a paperless world interferes with patient interactions and that placing a computer between the physician and the patient builds a barrier while removing an important point of contact.ĮMR systems don’t have to be dehumanizing. Physicians tend to get uncomfortable in discussions about EMR systems for these regulatory reasons. I wonder if the tone of EMR conversations might be different if they could be dissociated from concepts like “value-based care” and “meaningful use requirements.” Might doctors be more willing to accept electronic records if they were perceived as a way to improve efficiency rather than another requirement set forth by the regulatory landscape? Unfortunately, the promise of EMR systems has been somewhat stymied by their association with an ever-increasing slew of regulations that have very little to do with daily clinical operations. They can make us more efficient by, for instance, managing clerical tasks so we can be more focused on the needs of patients. More to the point, EMR systems can enhance the important work we do. In theory, electronic records are a platform that can help to improve outcomes, increase efficiency, enhance patient encounters, positively affect decision making, and otherwise make us better at taking care of patients. This holds true for electronic medical record (EMR) systems, as well. Even within ophthalmology, one could easily cite the advent of OCT or the evolution of femtosecond laser technology as just two of many such examples. From enhancements in diagnostic ability to improvements in surgical capabilities, there are myriad examples of how the expertise of humans has been augmented by innovations that yielded greater quantity and quality of care. In my prior experience as a practicing ophthalmologist, I witnessed numerous instances where the intersection of health care and technology produced wonderful advancements in the way physicians care for patients. The company offer US-based customer support alongside the system.Sponsored by Modernizing Medicine and originally appeared in Retina Today. Revolution EHR - Cloud-based Revolution EHR aims to cater for all optometry practice including single or multi-location, colleges and corporate practices. The company brought together a number of point solutions to build the EHR suite including MDOffice, Medflow, Key Medical, ioPracticeware, and EyeDoc. Specialty systemsĮyeMD - EyeMD EMR software delivers DICOM imaging, ICD-10 support and mobile system access for ophthalmology and dub-specialties including retina, cornea, pediatrics and glaucoma.Įye Care Leaders - Eye Care Leaders offers a suite of EHR and practice management applications including modules for revenue cycles, EHR, analytics, MIPS assurance, optical management and more. A quick shortcut is to consider specialty systems as likely cultural matches and leading providers as likely efficacy matches. With affordability and suitability covered by your requirements analysis and budget, culture and efficacy are often harder to assess.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |